From Richard Peters
Belmont [Pa.] Feby 23d 1814
Dear Sir
I have had a Visitation of my old Enemy the Vertigo. It is periodical, & continuous every Year, thro’ February & March, less or more vindictively, accordingly as good or bad Luck attends me; No Care or Attention will repel it entirely. It has been very oppressive & destressing to me. I am getting the better of it; but it retreats sourly. I should have acknowledged the Receipt of your Favour of the last of January, sooner, but for this embarrassing State of Pericranium. I cannot now satisfy myself on the Points you say you shall differ with me in. I am fortunate, considering the short time I had to think or prepare that the Points of Difference are so few. I hate the Subject of Treason. It is commonly an Engine of Oppression, I may therefore be too straitlaced. But I never would commit a Person charged with this offense, without two Witnesses. I sent Sedgwick & Hamilton down from the Whiskey Country, in 1794, with only one Witness. Rather they were smuggled into my d<i>st. The Supreme Court U.S. discharged them. I shall not, however, be stiff on these Points. But you had better state them, as being Matters about which there are Differences of Opinion.
Yesterday I went into Town to bear Testimony, as the Quakers express it, to the Faith I profess in the Washingtonian Creed. I went in a Procession, with my Brethren of the Cincinnati, composing a Part of a most numerous Train (probably 2000) of Washingtonians, with Banners & all Manner of Pageantry. We showed ourselves thro’ the City, neither courting nor fearing Martyrdom; & were peaceably suffered to pass on our Way to the Olympic Theatre; where perhaps double the Number mentioned, heard an excellent Oration, from a Mr Condy Raguet, the Orator of the Day. I was delighted, beyond Measure, with what I saw; & rejoiced that so great a Number of the faithful were permitted to assemble, & publicly profess their political Creed. This Society of political Christians increases much. I mean the Washington Benevolent. They consist now of about 2600. There is also a numerous Society of young Men, called the Washington Association. I know not their Numbers; but there is a great Show of excellent Stuff among them. Not a single Rudeness, Noise, or Indecency appeared; Tho’ the Crowd of Spectator was immense; & consisted of all Sorts & Conditions of Bipeds.
The only disagreeable & painful Circumstance occurring to me was what I heard of your Non attendance at the Supreme Court; occasioned, as it was said, by Illness. I am very uneasy under this Intelligence; & hope you will be enabled to contradict it. I beg you to let me know the State of your Health. We have both lived long enough to see the “esto perpetua” of the Constitution, a mere Piece of Irony.
I allow that you reason well on the Point of one Witness to the Grand Jury, to find the Bill. But you reason like a Crown Lawyer. Yet not without legal Force. It certainly is a Case omitted in our Constitution & Laws. One may therefore feel, as well as think, differently; salvo contenemento. I know you have no Desire, one Way or the other. If I have any, it is, that Prosecutions for Treason may not be rendered too easy; by admitting one prejudiced or mistaken Witness, to fix a Charge even before a Grand Jury. A “Conviction” may not follow; but Persecution & Ruin may be the Consequence to some who are even charged. I would always take Bail, where only the Witness supported a Charge.
As to the Confession out of Court, proved by one Witness to the Grand Jury, I do not think I did give, or wished to give, an Opinion. So you may let that Point be considered as relating to the Trial: And I agree that in this, as well as other Points not necessary to enlighten a Grand Jury, it is best to say Nothing; when the Points may be discussed on the Trial. You know that I did not approve of premature Decisions, tho’ I had nearly been ‘peached for them; when I was chased, & Chase hunted.
I shall be glad to hear your Charge in the Spring. Not that I delight in such Homilies, per se. But it will be a Proof that you have no Occasion for Charges of Physicians & apothecaries; which, tho’ they may be ever so legal, are always nauseating. yours very truly & affectionately
Richard Peters
ALS, NHi: Richard Peters Collection. The letter was postmarked in Philadelphia. Peters noted on the cover “If Judge W. not at Washington, the P. Master will be pleased to forward this letter to M. Vernon.”